Pollock et al v. Federal Insurance Company

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District Court
Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
THOMAS POLLOCK, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant.
Case No. 21-cv-09975-JCS
ORDER RE ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
Re: Dkt. No. 265
On December 10, 2025, Plaintiffs Thomas Pollock and Eileen Tabios filed an Unopposed
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (“Motion”). Having considered the papers and evidence
submitted, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The Motion
is GRANTED. Exhibits 3 and 4 to the Declaration of April M. Strauss in Opposition to Defendant
Federal Insurance Company’s Motion to Strike Late-Produced Documents Under Rule 37 shall be
sealed in their entirety.
The Court notes that Exhibit 1 to the same declaration was filed under seal even though
Plaintiffs state in their sealing motion that “the Parties have stipulated that this exhibit does not
warrant sealing.” Dkt. no. 265 at 1. Because that document was not accompanied by a sealing
motion, it should have been filed in the public record. Therefore, Plaintiffs are ordered to
promptly file Exhibit 1 in the public record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 3, 2026
______________________________________
JOSEPH C. SPERO
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 3:21-cv-09975-JCS Document 270 Filed 01/03/26 Page 1 of 1