4:10-ap-04246•Heritage Pacific Financial, LLC D/B/A Heritage Pac v. Hanson
Heritage Pacific Financial, LLC D/B/A Heritage Pac v. Hanson
4:10-ap-04246Canb1 ago 2011
Testo completo
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION In re ) Case No. 10-45167 ) Centorial D. Hanson, ) ) Debtor, ) Chapter 13 ) _____________________________ ) ) Heritage Pacific Financial, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Adv. Pro. No. 10-4246 ) ) vs. ) ) Centorial D. Hanson, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM TO PARTIES RE: HEARING ON PLAINTIFF HERITAGE PACIFIC FINANCIAL, LLC’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“the Motion”) and the supporting pleadings and declarations. The Court notes that the Motion is based principally upon matters that are deemed admitted as a result of Defendant’s failure to answer Plaintiff’s The following constitutes the Memorandum Decision of the Court. Signed August 01, 2011 ________________________________________ William J. Lafferty, III U.S. Bankruptcy Judge ________________________________________ Entered on Docket August 02, 2011 GLORIA L. FRANKLIN, CLERK U.S BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case: 10-04246 Doc# 29 Filed: 08/01/11 Entered: 08/02/11 11:00:57 Page 1 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Requests for Admission (RFAs). The Court further notes that Plaintiff served 49 separate RFAs, each of which purported to require Respondent to state in detail the basis for denial, if any. The Court further notes the provisions of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 33(a)(1) and 36 and Northern District of California Local Rules 33-1 and 36-1, incorporated into the Bankruptcy Local Rules by BLR 1001-2, which are relevant to the total number of written interrogatories permitted in a disputed matter and, by inference, the total number of RFAs when the RFAs request particular bases for denial. The Court directs Counsel for the Moving Party to address the applicability of these rules at the oral argument for the Motion. ***END OF MEMORANDUM*** Case: 10-04246 Doc# 29 Filed: 08/01/11 Entered: 08/02/11 11:00:57 Page 2 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Court Service List Centorial D. Hanson 1726 Benedict Drive San Leandro, CA 94577 Brad A. Mokri Law Offices of Mokri and Assoc. 1851 E 1st St. #900 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Case: 10-04246 Doc# 29 Filed: 08/01/11 Entered: 08/02/11 11:00:57 Page 3 of 3
Ti chiedi come si applica questo testo alla tua situazione?
Consulenza gratuita, senza impegno
Descrivi la tua situazione. Il nostro team ti ricontatterà via e-mail per la tua consulenza.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.