Lydia Wilson

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
In re
LYDIA WILSON, 	No. 11-10683
Debtor(s).
______________________________________/
Memorandum on Motion for Sale Free and Clear
_________________
At the time her Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition was filed on Feb. 26, 2011, Lydia Wilson
operated a jewelry business known as Marlowe & Co. Jewellers. Wilson’s inventory included jewelry
she owned as well as jewelry consigned to her. The consignors concede they did not file UCC-1
financing statements which would have perfected their interest in the goods. The Trustee of the
bankruptcy estate, Linda Green, would like to sell all of the jewelry, including the consigned jewelry,
in an online auction as part of her duty to expeditiously liquidate the assets of the estate. She has
therefore moved the court for leave to sell all of the jewelry free and clear of consignor interests, with
such interests attaching to the proceeds of sale.
Several parties who consigned their jewelry to Wilson have objected to the motion. They argue
that the consigned goods must be declared property of the estate before being sold. They assert that
they should have the opportunity to show the court that they have perfected interests in the consigned
jewelry, notwithstanding the lack of UCC-1 statements, and thereby are entitled to have their
respective pieces returned to them rather than sold.
1
Entered on Docket
July 08, 2011
GLORIA L. FRANKLIN, CLERK
U.S BANKRUPTCY COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case: 11-10683 Doc# 79 Filed: 07/08/11 Entered: 07/08/11 16:10:45 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
A sale free and clear of the disputed interests seems to be in the best interests of all parties,
including the consignors. The jewelry would be turned into cash with the liens and interests attaching
to the cash instead of the unsold jewelry. An auction appears to be the best way to maximize the
selling prices, and consignors could always protect themselves by making appropriate bids. Still, the
law is clear that the court cannot compel a sale of consigned jewelry sale free and clear of the interests
of consignors until the property has been adjudicated property of the estate. 	3 Collier on Bankruptcy
(16 th Ed), ¶ 363.06, p. 363-40, citing In re Popp, 323 B.R. 260 (9th Cir. BAP 2005); In re Whitehall
Jewelers Holdings, Inc., 2008 WL 2951974 (Bkrtcy.D.Del.2008); In re Interiors of Yesterday, LLC,
2007 WL 419646 (Bkrtcy.D.Conn.2007).
For the foregoing reasons, the Trustee’s motion will be denied without prejudice to renewal
once the consigned jewelry has been adjudicated to be property of the bankruptcy estate. The court
will expedite that litigation as necessary.
Any party may submit an appropriate form of order.
Dated: July 8, 2011
SAlan Jaroslovsky
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge
2
Case: 11-10683 Doc# 79 Filed: 07/08/11 Entered: 07/08/11 16:10:45 Page 2 of 2