Bradley et al v. Schlom et al

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
In re
MICHAEL and KAROLYN BRADLEY, No. 02-11609
Debtor(s).
______________________________________/
MICHAEL and KAROLYN BRADLEY,
Plaintiff(s),
v. A.P. No. 04-1093
BARRY R. SCHLOM,
Defendant(s).
_______________________________________/
Memorandum
_________________
Despite being adjudicated in the form of an adversary proceeding, the judgment rendered against
defendant Schlom was a sanction for contempt. As such, credit for other settlement payments is not
appropriate, so Schlom is not entitled to have the judgment deemed satisfied. However, the court will
eliminate the provision for recovery of costs and reduce the sanction to $7,500.00 only provided it is
paid promptly. In all other respects, Schlom’s motion will be denied. No hearing will be held. Either
side may submit an appropriate form of order. Schlom may submit an appropriate form of amended
judgment along with proof of his payment of $7,500.00.
Dated: October 25, 2005
SAlan Jaroslovsky
U.S. Bankruptcy Judge
Entered on Docket
October 25, 2005
GLORIA L. FRANKLIN, CLERK
U.S BANKRUPTCY COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case: 04-01093 Doc# 48 Filed: 10/25/05 Entered: 10/25/05 15:37:29 Page 1 of 1