Diaz v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
----oo0oo----
AARON CASTILLO, on behalf of
himself and all others
similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
v.
T-MOBILE USA, INC. dba T-
MOBILE; and DOES 1 through 50,
inclusive,
Defendants.
No. 2:25-cv-2208-WBS-SCR
ORDER RELATING CASES
RYAN DIAZ, as an individual and
on behalf of all others
similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
v.
T-MOBILE USA, INC., a Delaware
corporation; and DOES 1 through
50,inclusive,
Defendants.
No. 2:25-cv-2933-TLN-CSK
----oo0oo----
Case 2:25-cv-02933-WBS-SCR Document 16 Filed 11/04/25 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that
they are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123(a), because
they involve the same allegations and causes of action against
the same defendants. Accordingly, the assignment of the matters
to the same judge is likely to effect a saving of judicial effort
and is also likely to be convenient for the parties.
The parties should be aware that relating the cases
under Local Rule 123 merely has the result that both actions are
assigned to the same judge; no consolidation of the actions is
effected. Under the regular practice of this court, related
cases are generally assigned to the judge to whom the first filed
action was assigned.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the actions denominated
Castillo v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., Case No. 2:25-cv-2208-WBS-SCR,
and Diaz v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., Case No. 2:25-cv-2933-TLN-CSK,
be, and the same hereby are, deemed related. The case
denominated Diaz v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., Case No. 2:25-cv-2933-
TLN-CSK, shall be reassigned to Judge WILLIAM B. SHUBB and Judge
SEAN C. RIORDAN. Any dates currently set in the reassigned case
only are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the captions on documents
filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as Diaz v. T-Mobile
USA, Inc., Case No. 2:25-cv-2933-WBS-SCR.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make
an appropriate adjustment in the assignment of cases to
compensate for this reassignment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 3, 2025
Case 2:25-cv-02933-WBS-SCR Document 16 Filed 11/04/25 Page 2 of 2