(PS) Stiles v. Procter & Gamble Co.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SHARIDAN STILES,
Plaintiff,
v.
PROCTOR & GAMBLE COMPANY,
Defendant.
No. 2:23-cv-0474 DAD AC PS
ORDER
Plaintiff is proceeding in this case in pro se. On October 23, 2023, plaintiff was notified
that she had not properly served defendant in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.
ECF No. 21 at 1. Plaintiff was given an opportunity to properly complete service within 60 days.
ECF No. 21 at 2. On December 7, 2023, shortly before the 60 day period was up, this case was
related to other pending cases in this district. ECF No. 24. The 60 day period passed without
plaintiff filing a proof of service. Then, on April 12, 2024, this case was stayed pending the
resolution of a related case. ECF No. 29. The stay was lifted on November 17, 2025. ECF No.
31. Defendant confirmed that as of December 8, 2025, it has not been properly served. ECF No.
32.
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall show cause, in
writing, within 14 days, why her failure to submit service documents should not result in a
recommendation that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The filing of service
Case 2:23-cv-00474-DAD-AC Document 34 Filed 12/11/25 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
documents within this timeframe will serve as cause and will discharge this order. If plaintiff
fails to respond, the court will recommend dismissal of this case pursuant to Local Civil Rule
110.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: December 11, 2025
Case 2:23-cv-00474-DAD-AC Document 34 Filed 12/11/25 Page 2 of 2