1:25-cv-00507 | Omnilex

Testo completo

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL SNELL,
Plaintiff,
v.
TUOLUMNE COUNTY, et al.,
Defendants.
No. 1:25-cv-00507-KES-SAB (PC)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
(ECF No. 24)
Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to
42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On November 21, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff complaint, found no cognizable
claims, and granted Plaintiff the opportunity to amend the complaint. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff has
not filed an amended complaint or otherwise communicated with the Court and the time to do so
has passed. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause within
fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this order why this action should not be dismissed
for failure to state a cognizable claim. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order will result in a
recommendation to dismiss the action for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 5, 2026
STANLEY A. BOONE
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 1:25-cv-00507-KES-SAB Document 15 Filed 01/06/26 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case 1:25-cv-00507-KES-SAB Document 15 Filed 01/06/26 Page 2 of 2

1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 1:25-cv-00507-KES-SAB Document 15 Filed 01/06/26
Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL SNELL,
Plaintiff,
V.
TUOLUMNE COUNTY, et al., Defendants.
No. 1:25-cv-00507-KES-SAB (PC)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED (ECF No. 24)
Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On November 21, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff complaint, found no cognizable claims, and granted Plaintiff the opportunity to amend the complaint. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise communicated with the Court and the time to do so has passed. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of this order why this action should not be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation to dismiss the action for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
January 5, 2026
Say A. Be
STANLEY A. BOONE United States Magistrate Judge
AUTHENTICATED U.S. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION GPO
1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Case 1:25-cv-00507-KES-SAB Document 15 Filed 01/06/26
Page 2 of 2
2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

(PC) Snell v. Tuolumne County, et al.

Testo completo

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude