Michael Yoon and Sandra Yoon

-1-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LOS ANGELES DIVISION
In re:
Michael Yoon
Sandra Yoon
Debtors.
Case No.: 2:12-bk-10787-TD
CHAPTER 7
ORDER GRANTING BBCN BANK’S
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
OF ITS CLAIM
Date: October 2, 2014
Time: 11:00 a.m.
Courtroom: 1345
The court entered several orders following a hearing on May 14, 2014, on the
Motion of BBCN Bank (the Bank) for reconsideration of its claims, against the Debtors.
In the Order entered July 15, among other things, the court vacated a prior order
entered March 17, sustaining the Debtors’ objection to the Bank’s Claim No. 8.
Based on a stipulation of the parties, the court on July 9, continued the hearing
on the Bank’s Motion, among other things, to allow Debtors reasonable additional time
to evaluate the Bank’s documents and filings and to allow further discussions.
Later stipulations and orders allowed the Debtors to file a supplemental
opposition to the Bank’s claims up to two weeks prior to a hearing finally scheduled for
FILED & ENTERED
OCT 24 2014
CLERK U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT
Central District of California
BY DEPUTY CLERK	toliver
Case 2:12-bk-10787-TD Doc 220 Filed 10/24/14 Entered 10/24/14 15:09:50 Desc
Main Document Page 1 of 2

-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
October 2. The Debtors conducted further discovery as agreed and filed their
supplemental opposition on September 18.
The hearing took place on October 2. The results of that hearing are reflected in
the record of the hearing. Essentially, Debtors raised several new issues concerning
the Bank’s claims, attempted to extend further their time for discovery, but failed to
follow the requirements of the court’s LBRs 7026-1, 3007-1, and 9013-1 in order to do
so. The court finds that Debtors were allowed adequate time to complete additional
discovery and discussions with the Bank and that Debtors’ failed to timely and properly
pursue the foregoing LBR procedures. The Debtors also failed to provide evidence
sufficient to discredit the Bank’s evidence as fully considered by the court at the May 14,
2014 hearing.
For the foregoing reasons, the court’s rulings at the May 14 hearing, as reflected
on the record and in the Order entered July 15, hereby are deemed to be final. The
Debtors’ objections to the Bank’s claims are overruled. The Bank’s claims as amended
in Claim No. 11 are granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: October 24, 2014
Case 2:12-bk-10787-TD Doc 220 Filed 10/24/14 Entered 10/24/14 15:09:50 Desc
Main Document Page 2 of 2