Barragan et al v. DI Overnite LLC et al

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Rene Barragan, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
DI Overnite LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
No. CV-25-02252-PHX-KML
ORDER
Plaintiffs’ original complaint named “Jane Doe Ugarte” as a defendant. (Doc. 1.)
Plaintiffs later determined the individual’s true name is “Lorez Ugarte.” (Doc. 8 at 1.)
Plaintiffs seek leave to amend the complaint to replace all references to “Jane Doe Ugarte”
with “Lorez Ugarte.” Plaintiffs argue this substitution “will likely assist in Plaintiffs’ effort
to collect on what will likely be a forthcoming default judgment against all defendants.”
(Doc. 16 at 2.) Plaintiffs do not explain why amending the complaint will have that effect,
but the standard for amending the complaint is very lenient at this stage. Fed. R. Civ. P.
15(a)(2). Under that standard, allowing amendment is appropriate.
IT IS ORDERED the Motion to Amend (Doc. 16) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall
file their amended complaint within ten days of this order.
/
/
/
/
Case 2:25-cv-02252-KML Document 17 Filed 01/05/26 Page 1 of 2

- 2 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED plaintiffs shall file their motion for default judgment
within fourteen days of filing the amended complaint.
Dated this 2nd day of January, 2026.
Case 2:25-cv-02252-KML Document 17 Filed 01/05/26 Page 2 of 2