6:24-cv-06017•Brown v. Otts et al
Testo completo
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS HOT SPRINGS DIVISION CE’DRICK J. BROWN PLAINTIFF v. Case No. 6:24-cv-06017 MAJOR FREDRICK OTTS; SERGEANT B. MORGANN; and CORPORAL SHANLEVER DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed October 3, 2024, by the Honorable Christy Comstock, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (ECF No. 29). Judge Comstock recommends that Plaintiff Ce’drick J. Brown’s (“Plaintiff”) second Motion to Intervene (ECF No. 26) be denied. Plaintiff has not responded to the Report and Recommendation, and the time to do so has passed.1 See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Upon review, finding no clear error on the face of the record and that Judge Comstock’s reasoning is sound, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 29) in toto. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s second Motion to Intervene (ECF No. 26) is hereby DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 25th day of October, 2024. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey Chief United States District Judge 1On October 22, 2024, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 33). However, Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is unrelated and raises no objections to Judge Comstock’s Report and Recommendation. Case 6:24-cv-06017-SOH Document 35 Filed 10/25/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: <pageID>
Ti chiedi come si applica questo testo alla tua situazione?
Consulenza gratuita, senza impegno
Descrivi la tua situazione. Il nostro team ti ricontatterà via e-mail per la tua consulenza.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.