Smith v. Bi Haven Investments

4:24-cv-04105Arwd10 mar 2025

Testo completo

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
TEXARKANA DIVISION
TORIN SMITH 	PLAINTIFF
v. 	Case No. 4:24-cv-4105
BI HAVEN INVESTMENTS 	DEFENDANT
ORDER
Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) issued by the Honorable Barry
A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. 	ECF No. 13.
Judge Bryant recommends that Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 2) be dismissed pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) because all issues in Plaintiff’s Complaint were raised and addressed in a
previous case brought by Plaintiff, rendering the claims barred by the doctrine of res judicata. See
Smith v. Patel and Bhavin Investments, Inc., Case No. 4:21-cv-04035-SOH. Judge Bryant further
recommends that the Clerk be directed to place a § 1915(g) strike flag on the case for future judicial
consideration and that the Court certify pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from
this dismissal would not be taken in good faith.
Plaintiff filed a timely objection. ECF No. 14. However, Plaintiff does not address any of
Judge Bryant’s reasoning and instead reiterates the allegations in his Complaint. 	Without a
specific objection, the Court is only required to review Judge Bryant’s R&R for clear error. See
Griffini v. Mitchell, 31 F.3d 690, 692 (8th Cir. 1994) (noting that a specific objection is necessary
to require a de novo review of a magistrate’s recommendation instead of a review for clear error).
Upon review, finding no clear error on the face of the record and that Judge Bryant’s
reasoning is sound, the Court adopts the R&R (ECF No. 13) in toto. Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF
No. 2) is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is hereby directed to place a §
Case 4:24-cv-04105-SOH Document 15 Filed 03/10/25 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>
2
1915(g) strike flag on the case for future judicial consideration. The Court certifies pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 10th day of March, 2025.
/s/ Susan O. Hickey
Susan O. Hickey
Chief United States District Judge
Case 4:24-cv-04105-SOH Document 15 Filed 03/10/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.