Burris v. Baxter County Regional Hospital

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
HARRISON DIVISION
ANGEL BURRIS, Individually and on
Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated 	PLAINTIFF
V. 	CASE NO. 3:23-CV-3008
BAXTER COUNTY REGIONAL HOSPITAL, INC. 	DEFENDANT
ORDER
Currently before the Court is the parties' Agreed Motion for Entry of Representative
Discovery Plan. (Doc. 65). The Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.
The Motion is GRANTED to the extent of the agreed-to terms of the proposed
representative discovery plan set out in the Motion. The Motion is DENIED with respect
to the disputed terms and the parties are INSTRUCTED to proceed as follows:
• 	Of the 20% of Opt-in Plaintiffs who the parties have agreed will be subject to written
discovery, Burris shall select 40% of the Opt-in Plaintiffs who will be subject to
written discovery and Baxter shall select the other 60%.
• 	Baxter is permitted to depose a total of 15 Plaintiffs to include Burris, 5 Opt-in
Plaintiffs selected by Burris, and ~ 	t-in Plaintiffs selected by Baxter.
IT IS SO ORDERED on this fi day of September: 	4 .
. B 	~ 	S
TES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 3:23-cv-03008-MEF Document 66 Filed 09/24/24 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>