Gladden v. Huber et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
JEREMY WAYNE GLADDEN 	PLAINTIFF
V. 	CASE NO. 2:24-CV-2110
DETECTIVE SERENA HOLLAND, Lufkin, Texas;
LIEUTENANT WESLEY WAGGONER, Lufkin, Texas;
CAPTAIN MICHAEL HUBER, Johnson County, Arkansas;
and INVESTIGATOR DEREK ROGERS, Johnson County, AR 	DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Now before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 9) of the
Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of
Arkansas. Fourteen days have passed, and no party filed objections to the Report and
Recommendation.
The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds
as follows: the Report and Recommendation is proper and is hereby ADOPTED IN ITS
ENTIRETY. Accordingly, upon preservice screening, IT IS ORDERED that:
(1) All claims against Defendants Holland and Waggoner are dismissed for lack
of personal jurisdiction;
(2) all Fifth and Sixth Amendment Denial of Counsel Claims are dismissed; and
(3) the denial of medical care claims arising after Gladden’s incarceration are
dismissed.
This leaves for later resolution Gladden’s false arrest claim, his excessive force
claim, and his denial of medical care at the scene of the arrest claim. By separate order
the Amended Complaint will be served on Defendants Huber and Rogers.
Case 2:24-cv-02110-TLB Document 14 Filed 10/29/24 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>

2
IT IS SO ORDERED on this 29th day of October, 2024.
/s/ Timothy L. Brooks
TIMOTHY L. BROOKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:24-cv-02110-TLB Document 14 Filed 10/29/24 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>