USA v. Nguyen et al

AO72A
(Rev. 8/82)
Document #195 filed by Defendant on July 21, 2006, is entitled
1
Notice of Motion Petitioner General Traverse to Government Brief in Support
of Response to Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2255, Filed in this Honorable Court on April 20, 2006. After
reviewing the document, the Court has construed the pleading as objections
to the instant report and recommendation that recommends the denial of
Defendant’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF
v. Civil No. 06-2046
Criminal No. 03CR20039-002
HONG TRANH PHAN DEFENDANT
ORDER
Now on this 8 day of August 2006, there comes on for	th
consideration the report and recommendation filed herein on July 6,
2006, by the Honorable Beverly Stites Jones, United States
Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. (Doc. 193).
Defendant filed written objections to the report and
recommendation. (Docs. 195-196).	1
The court has reviewed this case de novo and, being well and
sufficiently advised, finds as follows: The report and
recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is adopted in its
entirety. Accordingly, Defendant’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion (Doc.
185) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Robert T. Dawson
Honorable Robert T. Dawson
United States District Judge
Case 2:03-cr-20039-TLB Document 197 Filed 08/08/06 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>