Robertson v. Sander et al

4:25-cv-00930Ared28 ott 2025

Testo completo

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CENTRAL DIVISION
MICHAEL ROBERTSON 	PLAINTIFF
v. 	CASE NO. 4:25-CV-00930-BSM
SARAH SANDER, et al. 	DEFENDANTS
ORDER
After de novo review of the record, United States Magistrate Judge Benecia B.
Moore’s recommended disposition [Doc. No. 8] is adopted, Michael Robertson’s motion for
leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. No. 5] is denied, and his amended complaint [Doc.
No. 6] is dismissed without prejudice because he has had at least three previous actions
dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim, and has not shown that he
is currently in imminent danger of serious physical injury or paid the filing fee. 	See 28
U.S.C. § 1915(g) (prisoners may not proceed in forma pauperis if three or more of their
claims have been dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or failure to state a claim, unless they
show they are in imminent danger of serious physical injury). 	If Robertson wishes to
continue this case, he must submit the statutory and administrative fees of $405 to the Clerk
of Court with a motion to reopen the case. An in forma pauperis appeal of this order would
not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of October, 2025.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 4:25-cv-00930-BSM Document 13 Filed 10/28/25 Page 1 of 1

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.