Walker v. Campbell et al

IN THE 	UNITED 	STATES 	DISTRICT 	COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT 	OF 	ARKANSAS
DELTA 	DIVISION
MOSE 	WALKER
No. 2:24-cv-108-DPM
PLAINTIFF
ROBBIN 	A. CAMPBELL, 	JR., 	Chief, 	in 	his
individual 	and 	official 	capacity; 	and
THE 	CITY OF WEST MEMPHIS 	DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The 	Court 	notes 	Campbell's 	notice 	of 	filing, 	Doc. 	38. 	Campbell
may 	conventionally file 	his 	audio and 	video 	exhibits 	with the Clerk and
send 	copies 	to 	Walker 	and 	the 	Court.
On 	filing 	matters 	under 	seal: 	the Court 	directs 	the 	parties 	to
follow the 	procedures 	in 	their 	Agreed 	Protective 	Order, 	Doc. 	20, 	as
elaborated 	in 	this Order. Confidential information 	must, 	if 	practicable,
be redacted. 	If redaction 	is 	impracticable, 	a 	party 	must 	move 	for
permission 	to 	file 	the 	document under seal. 	Doc. 	20 	cit 	4. 	The 	moving
party 	must 	justify 	sealing 	with 	specifics 	and solid 	reasons, 	including 	an
explanation 	about 	why 	redaction 	cannot 	be 	done. The 	Court 	prefers 	a
document-by-document 	explanation. 	A 	party's designation 	of 	material
as 	confidential 	is 	not, 	standing 	alone, a sufficient reason 	to 	keep 	a
document under 	seal.
Case 2:24-cv-00108-DPM Document 41 Filed 11/06/25 Page 1 of 2

Campbell 	has 	filed documents 	under seal without 	seeking 	prior
permission. No 	reasons have 	been 	given. 	And 	he 	hasn't 	explained why
redaction wasn't 	practicable. 	Campbell 	must 	therefore 	file 	redacted
substitutes, 	or 	a 	notice 	with 	his 	reasons 	and 	explanation for 	keeping
any 	unredactable document under 	seal, 	by 	14 	November 	2025. 	If
Walker 	objects 	on 	any 	document, he 	may 	respond 	within 	seven
calendar 	days 	of 	Campbell's 	filing. 	And 	Campbell 	may 	reply 	within
five calendar 	days 	of 	any 	response.
So 	Ordered.
D.P. 	Marshall 	Jr"
United 	States 	District 	Judge
-2-
Case 2:24-cv-00108-DPM Document 41 Filed 11/06/25 Page 2 of 2