Eldridge v. Armstrong et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
DANNY LOUIS ELDRIDGE, 	:
Petitioner, 	:
vs. 	: 	Civil Action No. 24-00270-KD-B
JUDGE ROBERT ARMSTRONG III, 	:
et al.,
:
Respondents.
ORDER
After due and proper consideration of all issues raised, and a de novo
determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection
is made (docs. 10, 11), the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made
under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l) and dated October 8, 2024 (doc. 4), is ADOPTED as the
opinion of this Court.
Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE because
Eldridge has not exhausted all available state remedies, and pursuant to the Younger
abstention doctrine.
DONE and ORDERED this 6th day of January 2024.
s/ Kristi K. DuBose
KRISTI K. DuBOSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:24-cv-00270-KD-B Doc# 12 Filed 01/06/25 Page 1 of 1 PageID#
<pageID>