Rudolph v. 1ProFence

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
JAMES RUDOLPH, )
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) CIVIL ACTION No. 24-00267-KD-C
)
1PROFENCE, )
Defendant. )
ORDER
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues
raised, and there having been no objections filed, the report and recommendation of the Magistrate
Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and dated March 14, 2025, (Doc. 29), is ADOPTED as
the opinion of this Court.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim, (Doc. 21), is GRANTED.
Defendant 1 Pro Fence’s counterclaim demanding “judgment against Plaintiff James Rudolph in
the amount of $913, plus pre-judgment interest from the dates of the breach of the agreements,”
(Doc. 16 at 7), is DISMISSED.
DONE and ORDERED this 2nd day of April 2025.
/s/ Kristi K. DuBose
KRISTI K. DuBOSE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 1:24-cv-00267-KD-C Doc# 30 Filed 04/02/25 Page 1 of 1 PageID#
<pageID>