USA v. Fuhrer et al

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
CRAIG KING,
Defendant.
Case No. 3:19-cr-00026-TMB-SAO-5
ORDER ON DEFENDANT CRAIG
KING’S TWELFTH MOTION IN LIMINE
(DKT. 900)
The matter comes before the Court on Defendant Craig King’s Twelfth Motion in Limine
at Docket 900 (the “Motion”).1 Craig King asks the Court to “exclude from the jury any portion
of his law enforcement interview where he invokes his rights to speak to counsel.”2 The
Government does not oppose the Motion and says it will redact the interview as Craig King has
requested.3 The Court GRANTS the Motion at Docket 900 accordingly. The Government is
precluded from presenting the portion of Craig King’s law enforcement interview where he
requests to speak to a lawyer.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated at Anchorage, Alaska, this 6th day of March, 2022.
/s/ Timothy M. Burgess
TIMOTHY M. BURGESS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1 Dkt. 900 (Motion).
2 Id. at 1.
3 Dkt. 951 at 2 (Non-Opposition).
Case 3:19-cr-00026-TMB Document 1027 Filed 03/06/22 Page 1 of 1