Milan MacEk v. Cinadella Ann MacEk

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________
May 04, 2026

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A26A1675. MILAN MACEK v. CINADELLA ANN MACEK.

Milan Macek has filed this direct appeal from the trial court’s denial of his
verified petition for stalking protective order pursuant to OCGA § 16-5-94 against his
ex-wife, Cinadella Ann Macek. We lack jurisdiction.
“As a general rule, a party may file a direct appeal from a protective order that
was entered in an action brought under OCGA § 16-5-94, the general stalking
statute.” Phaneuf v. Anthony, 375 Ga. App. 636, 637 (917 SE2d 191) (2025). However,
given the nature of the relationship of the parties as ex-spouses, this case involves
allegations of family violence. See OCGA § 19-13-1 (“family violence” is defined
under the Family Violence Act as the occurrence of specified acts, including stalking,
“between past or present spouses”). And an application for discretionary appeal is
required to appeal when the order involves the Family Violence Act because such
cases are domestic relations cases within the meaning of OCGA § 5-6- 35(a)(2). See
Schmidt v. Schmidt, 270 Ga. 461, 461–62(1) (510 SE2d 810) (1999), disapproved on
other grounds by Gilliam v. State, 312 Ga. 60 (860 SE2d 543) (2021); see also OCGA
§ 5-6-35(a)(2) (appeals from orders in domestic relations cases must be by
discretionary application). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is
jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d
60) (1996).
Milan Macek’s failure to follow the discretionary appeals procedure deprives
us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
05/04/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.