Jesus Ruiz v. State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida
Opinion filed December 10, 2025.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-2054
Lower Tribunal No. F84-24737A
________________
Jesus Ruiz,
Appellant,
vs.
State of Florida,
Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from
the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Laura Shearon Cruz, Judge.
The Law Office of Robert David Malove, P.A., and Robert David
Malove and Hani Demetrious (Fort Lauderdale), for appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney
General, for appellee.
Before EMAS, LOGUE, and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM.

2
Affirmed. See Albritton v. State, 476 So. 2d 158, 160 (Fla. 1985)
superseded on other grounds by ch. 87-110, § 2, Laws of Fla. (holding that
“when a departure sentence is grounded on both valid and invalid reasons []
the sentence should be reversed and the case remanded for resentencing
unless the state is able to show beyond a reasonable doubt that the absence
of the invalid reasons would not have affected the departure sentence.”);
Ruiz v. State, 516 So. 2d 1057, 1058 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (“Ruiz I”) (affirming
defendant’s sentence because the two invalid bases for an upward departure
were subsumed within the third basis (an escalating pattern of criminal
activity), and holding “it is clear to us . . . that the sentence would have been
the same without the invalid reasons”); see also Tundidor v. State, 221 So.
3d 587, 605 (Fla. 2017) (holding “the error is harmless if the record
conclusively shows that the trial court would have imposed the same
sentence using a corrected scoresheet.”).