Kathleen Pierre Bryan v. Ricardo Bryan

2024-3319Fladistctapp4

Testo completo

D ISTRICT C OURT OF A PPEAL O F T HE STATE OF F LORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
KATHLEEN PIERRE BRYAN,
Appellant,
v.
RICARDO BRYAN,
Appellee.
No. 4D2024-3319
[December 10, 2025]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,
Broward County; Lauren Alperstein, Judge; L.T. Case No. 22-008435
FMCE.
Jerry L. Rumph, Jr. and Olivia M. Brooks of Brooks Law, Tallahassee,
for appellant.
Ricardo Bryan, North Lauderdale, pro se.
PER CURIAM .
Kathleen Pierre Bryan (the “former wife”) appeals a final judgment of
dissolution of marriage. 	We agree with the former wife that the final
judgment does not contain required findings on all elements of section
61.13(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2024), such as specific timesharing terms
and the methods the parents will use to communicate with the children,
among others. 	Moreover, the parenting plan does not make jurisdictional
findings 	required 	by 	section 	61.046(14)(b), 	Florida 	Statutes 	(2024).
Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to include the
required findings of these sections in the final judgment.
We 	affirm 	with 	respect 	to 	the 	former 	wife’s 	remaining 	arguments
without further discussion.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
KUNTZ , C.J., C IKLIN and SHAW , JJ., concur.
* 	* 	*
2
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT

KATHLEEN PIERRE BRYAN,
Appellant,

Vv.

RICARDO BRYAN,
Appellee.

No. 4D2024-3319
[December 10, 2025]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,
Broward County; Lauren Alperstein, Judge; L.T. Case No. 22-008435
FMCE.

Jerry L. Rumph, Jr. and Olivia M. Brooks of Brooks Law, Tallahassee,
for appellant.

Ricardo Bryan, North Lauderdale, pro se.
PER CURIAM.

Kathleen Pierre Bryan (the “former wife”) appeals a final judgment of
dissolution of marriage. We agree with the former wife that the final
judgment does not contain required findings on all elements of section
61.13(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2024), such as specific timesharing terms
and the methods the parents will use to communicate with the children,
among others. Moreover, the parenting plan does not make jurisdictional
findings required by section 61.046(14)(b), Florida Statutes (2024).
Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the trial court to include the
required findings of these sections in the final judgment.

We affirm with respect to the former wife’s remaining arguments
without further discussion.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

KUNTZ, C.J., CIKLIN and SHAW, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.