Jones v. State of Florida

2023-2172Fladistctapp1

Testo completo

FIRST DISTRICT C OURT OF A PPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA
_____________________________
No. 1D2023-2172
_____________________________
LANDO J ONES,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF F LORIDA,
Appellee.
_____________________________
On appeal from the County Court for Bay County.
Shane Vann, Judge.
February 18, 2026
PER C URIAM.
Lando Jones appeals from his judgment and sentence for
possession of drug paraphernalia. 	He raises three issues, but we
write to address only one.
Jones argues that the trial court erred by conducting a bench
trial even though Jones never waived his right to a jury trial. The
State 	concedes that this 	was reversible 	error, and 	we agree.
Criminal defendants have a constitutional right to a jury trial,
under both the United States and Florida constitutions. 	Amend.
VI, U.S. Const.; Art. I, § 22, Fla. Const. 	A defendant may waive
his right to a jury trial, “provided that the waiver is reflected on
2
the record.” 	Tucker v. State, 559 So. 2d 218, 219–20 (Fla. 1990).
Here, there is no record evidence that Jones ever waived his right
to a jury trial. Thus, we REVERSE Jones’ judgment and sentence.
K ELSEY, M.K. THOMAS, and L ONG, JJ., concur.
_____________________________
Not 	final 	until 	disposition 	of 	any 	timely 	and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331.
_____________________________
Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Danielle Jorden, Assistant
Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Miranda Lee Butson,
Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

OCR transcription; preserved printed pages are authoritative

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D2023-2172

LANDO JONES,
Appellant,
Vv.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

On appeal from the County Court for Bay County.
Shane Vann, Judge.

February 18, 2026

PER CURIAM.

Lando Jones appeals from his judgment and sentence for
possession of drug paraphernalia. He raises three issues, but we
write to address only one.

Jones argues that the trial court erred by conducting a bench
trial even though Jones never waived his right to a jury trial. The
State concedes that this was reversible error, and we agree.
Criminal defendants have a constitutional right to a jury trial,
under both the United States and Florida constitutions. Amend.
VI, U.S. Const.; Art. I, § 22, Fla. Const. A defendant may waive
his right to a jury trial, “provided that the waiver is reflected on

the record.” Tucker v. State, 559 So. 2d 218, 219-20 (Fla. 1990).
Here, there is no record evidence that Jones ever waived his right
to a jury trial. Thus, we REVERSE Jones’ judgment and sentence.

KELSEY, M.K. THOMAS, and LONG, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and
authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or
9.331,

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Danielle Jorden, Assistant
Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Miranda Lee Butson,
Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.