2024-0796•Florida Insurance Guaranty Association (FIGA) v. Joseph and Jacqulyn Richardson
Florida Insurance Guaranty Association (FIGA) v. Joseph and Jacqulyn Richardson
2024-0796Fladistctapp1
Testo completo
FIRST D ISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL S TATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2024-0796 _____________________________ F LORIDA I NSURANCE GUARANTY A SSOCIATION (FIGA), Appellant, v. J OSEPH and JACQULYN R ICHARDSON , Appellees. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Amy P. Brodersen, Judge. November 12, 2025 P ER C URIAM. A FFIRMED. See Chipchak v. Gauvin, 393 So. 3d 277, 279 (Fla. 5th DCA 2024) (holding that because the appellant withdrew an otherwise meritorious motion to set aside a judgment, he waived that argument); see also Pisano v. Mayo Clinic Fla., 333 So. 3d 782, 788 (Fla. 1st DCA 2022) (holding that because the appellants withdrew their motion for rehearing where new arguments could be raised, those arguments were not preserved for appeal); and see Agency for Health Care Admin. v. Orlando Reg’l Healthcare Sys., Inc., 617 So. 2d 385, 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (“It is basic that an appeal asserting error on the part of a lower tribunal can only be based on evidence presented to that lower tribunal.”).
2 RAY , KELSEY , and L ONG, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Dorothy DiFiore of Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. Chelsea T. Silvia of GED Lawyers, LLP, Boca Raton, for Appellees.
OCR transcription; preserved printed pages are authoritative
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D2024-0796 FLORIDA INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION (FIGA), Appellant, Vv. JOSEPH and JACQULYN RICHARDSON, Appellees. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Amy P. Brodersen, Judge. November 12, 2025 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Chipchak v. Gauvin, 393 So. 3d 277, 279 (Fla. 5th DCA 2024) (holding that because the appellant withdrew an otherwise meritorious motion to set aside a judgment, he waived that argument); see also Pisano v. Mayo Clinic Fla., 333 So. 3d 782, 788 (Fla. 1st DCA 2022) (holding that because the appellants withdrew their motion for rehearing where new arguments could be raised, those arguments were not preserved for appeal); and see Agency for Health Care Admin. v. Orlando Regi Healthcare Sys., Inc., 617 So. 2d 385, 389 (Fla. lst DCA 1998) (“It is basic that an appeal asserting error on the part of a lower tribunal can only be based on evidence presented to that lower tribunal.”). RAY, KELSEY, and LONG, JJ., concur. Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.831. Dorothy DiFiore of Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. Chelsea T. Silvia of GED Lawyers, LLP, Boca Raton, for Appellees.
Ti chiedi come si applica questo testo alla tua situazione?
Consulenza gratuita, senza impegno
Descrivi la tua situazione. Il nostro team ti ricontatterà via e-mail per la tua consulenza.
Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude
Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.