Antonio S. Hinojos, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. KOHL’S CORPORATION, a Wisconsin corporation

11-55793Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit8 lug 2013

Testo completo

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANTONIO S. HINOJOS, individually
and on behalf of all others similarly
situated,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
KOHL’S CORPORATION, a Wisconsin
corporation; KOHL’S DEPARTMENT
STORES, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 11-55793
D.C. No.
2:10-cv-07590-
ODW-AGR
ORDER
Filed July 8, 2013
Before: Stephen Reinhardt, Kim McLane Wardlaw,
and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The majority opinion filed May 21, 2013, is hereby
amended as follows:
1. Footnote 6, Slip. Op. at 11, is deleted.

-- 1 of 2 --

HINOJOS V. KOHL’S CORP. 2
With this amendment, the panel has voted to deny the
petition for panel rehearing and the suggestion for rehearing
en banc.
The full court has been advised of the petition for
rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on
whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35. The
petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are denied.
The petition for rehearing and the suggestion for
rehearing en banc are DENIED. No future petitions for
rehearing or petitions for rehearing en banc will be
entertained.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.