Karen Golinski v. United States Office of Personnel Management

12-15388Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit22 mag 2012

Testo completo

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
 KAREN GOLINSKI,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
UNITED STATES OFFICE OF
PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; JOHN No. 12-15388
BERRY, Director of the United D.C. No. States Office of Personnel 3:10-cv-00257-JSW Management, in his official  Northern District capacity, of California, Defendants, San Francisco
and
BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY
GROUP OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES,
Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant. 
5873

-- 1 of 3 --

 KAREN GOLINSKI,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
UNITED STATES OFFICE OF No. 12-15409PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; JOHN
D.C. No. BERRY, Director of the United
3:10-cv-00257-JSW States Office of Personnel
Northern District Management, in his official  of California, capacity,
San Francisco Defendants-Appellants,
and ORDER
BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY
GROUP OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES,
Intervenor-Defendant. 
Filed May 22, 2012
Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Circuit Judge and
En Banc Coordinator.
ORDER
Pursuant to G.O. 5.2, the petition for initial hearing en banc
was circulated to the court. A time was established by which
any judge could request a vote on the petition. No judge
requested a vote within the time period. Therefore, the peti-
tion for initial hearing en banc is denied.
Chief Judge Kozinski and Judge Reinhardt did not partici-
pate in the consideration of this matter.
5874 GOLINSKI v. U.S. OPM

-- 2 of 3 --

The order filed April 11, 2012, remains in effect. The Clerk
shall calendar these consolidated appeals for argument before
a three-judge panel during the week of September 10-14,
2012, in San Francisco.
5875 GOLINSKI v. U.S. OPM

-- 3 of 3 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.