United States v. 2006-02-06 | 03-71066 | MAHARAJ VGONZALES | precedential | opinion |

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
 VINODH PARSAD MAHARAJ; SUNITA No. 03-71066
DEVI MAHARAJ; PREETIKA MAHARAJ; Agency Nos. MEENAL MAHARAJ; VINEET
A71-788-923 MAHARAJ, A71-788-924 Petitioners,  A72-402-323
v. A72-402-324
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney A72-402-325
General,
Respondent. 
 VINODH PARSAD MAHARAJ; SUNITA No. 03-73995
DEVI MAHARAJ; PREETIKA MAHARAJ; Agency Nos. MEENAL MAHARAJ; VINEET
A71-788-923 MAHARAJ, A71-788-924 Petitioners,  A72-402-323
v. A72-402-324
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney A72-402-325
General, ORDER
Respondent. 
Filed February 6, 2006
Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active
judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by
1585

-- 1 of 4 --

the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-
judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to
this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to
the extent adopted by the en banc court.
1586 MAHARAJ v. GONZALES

-- 2 of 4 --

-- 3 of 4 --

PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2006 Thomson/West.

-- 4 of 4 --