Doe Viii v. Unocal Corporation, a California Corporation

00-56603Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit12 apr 2005

Testo completo

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
 JOHN DOE I, individually & as
Administrator of the Estate of his
deceased child Baby Doe I, & on
behalf of all others similarly
situated; JANE DOE, I, on behalf of
herself, as Adminstratrix of the
Estate of her deceased child Baby
Doe I, & on behalf of all others
similarly situated; JOHN DOE II;
JOHN DOE III; JOHN DOE IV; JOHN
DOE V; JANE DOE II; JANE DOE III; Nos. 00-56603 JOHN DOE VI; JOHN DOE VII; JOHN
00-57197 DOE VIII; JOHN DOE IX; JOHN DOE
 X; JOHN DOE XI, on behalf of D.C. No.
themselves & all others similarly CV-96-06959-
situated & Louisa Benson on RSWL
behalf of herself & the general
public,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
UNOCAL CORPORATION, a California
Corporation; TOTAL S.A., a
Foreign Corporation; JOHN IMLE,
an individual; ROGER C. BEACH, an
individual,
Defendants-Appellees. 
4171

-- 1 of 4 --

 JOHN ROE III; JOHN ROE VII; JOHN Nos. 00-56628
ROE VIII; JOHN ROE X, 00-57195
Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No.
v.  CV-96-06112-
UNOCAL CORPORATION; UNION OIL RSWL
COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, ORDER
Defendants-Appellees. 
Filed April 13, 2005
Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge, Stephen Reinhardt,
Alex Kozinski, Pamela Ann Rymer, Thomas G. Nelson,
A. Wallace Tashima, Susan P. Graber,
M. Margaret McKeown, William A. Fletcher,
Raymond C. Fisher, and Johnnie B. Rawlinson,
Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The parties’ stipulated motion to dismiss is GRANTED.
The appeals (00-56603, 00-56628, 00-57195, and 00-57197)
are dismissed with prejudice. Each party is to bear its own
costs.
The Appellants’ Unopposed Motion to Vacate District
Court Opinion, a motion in which Appellees join, is
GRANTED. The district court opinion in Doe v. Unocal
Corp., 110 F.Supp.2d 1294 (C.D. Cal. 2000), is VACATED.
4172 DOE v. UNOCAL CORP.

-- 2 of 4 --

-- 3 of 4 --

PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2005 Thomson/West.

-- 4 of 4 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.