United States v. 2020-09-11 | 20-10051 | USA V. BRIAN GOODMAN | nonprecedential | memorandum disposition |

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

BRIAN GOODMAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 20-10051

D.C. No.
1:12-cr-00113-LJO-SKO-1

MEMORANDUM
*

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Lawrence J. O’Neill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 8, 2020
**

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Brian Goodman appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges
the revocation of supervised release and resulting 24-month sentence. Pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Goodman’s counsel has filed a brief
stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as

*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED

SEP 11 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

2 20-10051
counsel of record. We have provided Goodman the opportunity to file a pro se
supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been
filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.