United States v. 2020-07-17 | 19-16679 | ALISON HATHEWAY V. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON | nonprecedential | memorandum disposition |

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALISON LORRAINE HATHEWAY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Trustee
of Certificate Holders CWALT Incorporated
Alternative Loan Trust 2006-18CB
Mortgage Pass Through Certificates Series
2006-18CB; CHARLES W. SCHARF, CEO
Bank of New York Mellon,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 19-16679

D.C. No. 3:18-cv-08332-DLR

MEMORANDUM
*

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 14, 2020
**

Before: CANBY, FRIEDLAND, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Alison Lorraine Hatheway appeals pro se from the district court’s order
dismissing her action alleging Fair Debt Collection Practices Act violations. We

*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED

JUL 17 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

2 19-16679
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for lack
of personal jurisdiction. Picot v. Weston, 780 F.3d 1206, 1211 (9th Cir. 2015).
We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Hatheway’s action for lack of personal
jurisdiction because Hatheway failed to allege facts sufficient to establish that
defendants had continuous and systematic contacts with Arizona to establish
general personal jurisdiction, or sufficient claim-related contacts with Arizona to
provide the court with specific personal jurisdiction over defendants. See
CollegeSource, Inc. v. AcademyOne, Inc., 653 F.3d 1066, 1074-76 (9th Cir. 2011)
(discussing requirements for general and specific personal jurisdiction).
AFFIRMED.