United States v. 2020-07-15 | 19-10400 | USA V. KEVIN DAVIS | nonprecedential | memorandum disposition |

19-10400United States Court Of Appeals For The 9th Circuit15 lug 2020

Testo completo

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

KEVIN LEE DAVIS, AKA Slow, AKA
Yellow Dude,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 19-10400

D.C. No. 4:98-cr-40082-YGR-3

MEMORANDUM
*

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California
Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 14, 2020
**

Before: CANBY, FRIEDLAND, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Kevin Lee Davis appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion
under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36 to correct the special assessment
imposed as part of his sentence. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), Davis’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief,

*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED

JUL 15 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

2 19-10400
along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Davis
the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or
answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.