United States v. 2020-01-10 | 19-70780 | DINA LUNA-RAMIREZ V. WILLIAM BARR | nonprecedential | memorandum disposition |

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DINA MARIBEL LUNA-RAMIREZ,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 19-70780

Agency No. A098-112-383

MEMORANDUM
*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 8, 2020
**

Before: CALLAHAN, NGUYEN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Dina Maribel Luna-Ramirez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions
for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her
motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen.
Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for

*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED

JAN 10 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

2 19-70780
review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Luna-Ramirez’s untimely
motion to reopen where she failed to establish prima facie eligibility for relief. See
Ramirez-Munoz v. Lynch, 816 F.3d 1226, 1228 (9th Cir. 2016) (the BIA may deny
a motion to reopen for failure to establish prima facie eligibility for the relief
sought).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.