5 6 JOSE LEON GONZALES-LONGORIA, AKA Jose Leon Gonzalez-Longoria v. Dennis Matthew Wong;

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 1
2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 3
4
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 5
6
JOSE LEON GONZALES-LONGORIA,
AKA Jose Leon Gonzalez-Longoria,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
DENNIS MATTHEW WONG; et al.,
Respondents-Appellees.
No. 18-15777
D.C. No. 1:17-cv-01587-LJO-MJS
MEMORANDUM*
7
Appeal from the United States District Court 8
for the Eastern District of California 9
Lawrence J. O’Neill, Chief Judge, Presiding 10
11
Submitted August 15, 2018**
12
13
Before: FARRIS, BYBEE, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 14
Federal prisoner Jose Leon Gonzales-Longoria appeals pro se from the 15
district court’s judgment dismissing his petition for writ of mandamus. We have 16
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Wilhelm v. Rotman, 680 17
F.3d 1113, 1118 (9th Cir. 2012) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A); Kildare v. 18
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
AUG 21 2018
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2
Saenz, 325 F. 3d 1078, 1082 (9th Cir. 2003) (denial of mandamus); Barren v. 1
Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (order) (dismissal under 28 2
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)). We affirm. 3
The district court properly dismissed Gonzalez-Longoria’s petition for writ 4
of mandamus because Gonzalez-Longoria failed to show that there was “no other 5
adequate remedy” available. Lowry v. Barhart, 329 F.3d 1019, 1021 (9th Cir. 6
2003) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted) (setting forth elements for 7
mandamus relief). 8
AFFIRMED. 9

-- 2 of 2 --