Charde Evans, on behalf of herself, and all others similarly situated v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CHARDE EVANS, on behalf of herself,
and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WAL-MART STORES, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 14-16566
D.C. No. 2:10-cv-01224-JCM-
VCF
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Nevada
James C. Mahan, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted July 8, 2016
San Francisco, California
Before: SILVERMAN and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges and ANELLO,** District
Judge.
Charde Evans appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment
regarding her claims for “waiting time” penalties pursuant to Nevada Revised
FILED
AUG 15 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The Honorable Michael M. Anello, United States District Judge for
the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.

-- 1 of 3 --

Statutes §§ 608.040 and 608.050. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,
and review de novo. See Szajer v. City of Los Angeles, 632 F.3d 607, 610 (9th Cir.
2011). We reverse and remand.
Wal-Mart employed Evans as an hourly stocker and cashier. At times,
Evans worked more than one eight-hour shift within a twenty-four-hour period or
more than forty hours in a workweek, entitling her to overtime pay under Nevada
law. After Evans filed suit, Wal-Mart settled her claims for unpaid overtime with
the Nevada Labor Commissioner. Although the Commissioner’s order does not
address Evans’s claims for waiting time penalties, the district court granted
summary judgment on grounds that waiting time penalties are only available when
an employer fails to timely pay the “contractually agreed upon wage,” not statutory
overtime pay.
The Labor Commissioner’s order does not reference waiting time penalties,
and therefore does not dispose of Evans’s waiting time penalty claims. We
conclude that overtime pay is a form of wages under Nevada law. See Nev. Rev.
Stat. § 608.012 (defining wages as “[t]he amount which an employer agrees to pay
an employee for the time the employee has worked, computed in proportion to
time”). Overtime pay is also a form of compensation under § 608.040. See Nev.
14-16566 2

-- 2 of 3 --

Rev. Stat. § 608.040 (providing for waiting time penalties for failure to pay wages
or compensation). Wal-Mart conceded at oral argument that Evans was employed
pursuant to an oral contract of employment, so Evans is also entitled to seek
waiting time penalties under § 608.050. See Nev. Rev. Stat. § 608.050 (providing
for waiting time penalties “in the sum agreed upon in the contract of
employment”).
Appellant’s motion for judicial notice is DENIED.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
14-16566 3

-- 3 of 3 --