Testo completo
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LACEY MARK SIVAK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TIMOTHY D. WILSON; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 14-35877
D.C. No. 1:93-cv-00081-EJL
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Idaho
Edward J. Lodge, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 15, 2016**
Before: GOODWIN, LEAVY, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
Lacey Mark Sivak, an Idaho state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district
court’s order denying his request to file various actions. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the application of a
vexatious litigant order. Moy v. United States, 906 F.2d 467, 469 (9th Cir. 1990).
FILED
MAR 25 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
-- 1 of 2 --
We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in revising a prior pre-filing
order to conform to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and in applying the revised order to
Sivak’s proposed actions.
AFFIRMED.
14-35877 2
-- 2 of 2 --
