Spiro Kamar; v. Radio Shack Corporation

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SPIRO KAMAR; et al.,
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
v.
RADIO SHACK CORPORATION,
Defendant,
ANTONIO BOATNER, Jr.,
Objector - Appellant.
No. 13-57157
D.C. No. 2:07-cv-02252-SJO-AJW
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
S. James Otero, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 18, 2015**
Before: TASHIMA, OWENS, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.
Antonio Boatner, Jr., appeals pro se from the district court’s order granting
final approval of a proposed settlement in a class action suit for labor violations.
FILED
DEC 02 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of
discretion the district court’s order granting final approval of the proposed
settlement. Staton v. Boeing Co., 327 F.3d 938, 953 (9th Cir. 2003). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion in granting final approval of
the proposed settlement because the proposed settlement was fundamentally fair,
adequate, and reasonable. See id. at 959 (setting forth factors to consider in
evaluating proposed settlement).
We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on
appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009) (per curiam).
All pending motions are denied as unnecessary.
AFFIRMED.
13-57157 2

-- 2 of 2 --