TIRSO MILIAN-ERISA, AKA Ruben Milian-Eriza v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TIRSO MILIAN-ERISA, AKA Ruben
Milian-Eriza,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 14-72803
Agency No. A092-429-787
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted July 21, 2015**
Before: CANBY, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
Tirso Milian-Erisa, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision denying his application for protection under the
Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.
FILED
JUL 31 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

§ 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings,
Blandino-Medina v. Holder, 712 F.3d 1338, 1348 (9th Cir. 2013), and we deny the
petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because
Milian-Erisa failed to establish it is more likely than not that he would be tortured
by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Mexico.
See Alphonsus v. Holder, 705 F.3d 1031, 1049-50 (9th Cir. 2013).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
2 14-72803

-- 2 of 2 --