United States of America v. Juan Camacho-Amador

14-50030Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit16 dic 2014

Testo completo

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JUAN CAMACHO-AMADOR,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 14-50030
D.C. No. 3:13-cr-02257-LAB
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California
Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 9, 2014**
Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
Juan Camacho-Amador appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges the 68-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for
importation of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
FILED
DEC 16 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

Camacho-Amador contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable
because he is a young, first-time offender who committed the offense to support
his family. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Camacho-
Amador’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The
sentence 120 months below the bottom of the Guidelines range is substantively
reasonable in light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)
sentencing factors. See id.
AFFIRMED.
14-50030 2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.