Edy Selamet Keliat v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

09-72670Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit3 gen 2014

Testo completo

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
EDY SELAMET KELIAT,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 09-72670
Agency No. A099-449-603
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 17, 2013**
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Edy Selamet Keliat, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of
the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for withholding of
removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial
FILED
JAN 03 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

evidence the agency’s factual findings, including whether an applicant has met his
burden of proof, Ren v. Holder, 648 F.3d 1079, 1083 (9th Cir. 2011), and we deny
the petition for review.
The agency denied Keliat’s claim for withholding of removal because he
failed to corroborate fundamental aspects of his claim – including, the burning of
his store, his two hospitalizations after beatings, and his report to the police – and
he failed to reasonably explain his failure to do so. Substantial evidence supports
the agency’s denial of withholding of removal. See id. at 1089-94 (upholding
conclusion petitioner failed to meet his burden of proof where he was given notice
of required corroboration and opportunity to obtain the evidence or explain his
failure to do so). We reject Keliat’s contentions that he met his burden of proof
without the corroborating evidence the IJ requested. See 8 U.S.C.
§ 1158(b)(1)(B)(ii); 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3)(C); Ren, 648 F.3d at 1094.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
2 09-72670

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.