Alicia Gonzalez Flores v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ALICIA GONZALEZ FLORES,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 12-73231
Agency No. A088-450-252
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted December 17, 2013**
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.
Alicia Gonzalez Flores, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision denying her application for cancellation of removal.
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo claims of due
FILED
DEC 18 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

process violations in immigration proceedings, Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey, 526
F.3d 1243, 1246 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition for review.
Gonzalez Flores’ due process claim fails because Gonzalez Flores was given
the opportunity to present witnesses on her behalf, she failed to request a
continuance when they did not appear, and she failed to demonstrate that the
absence of their testimony prejudiced her. See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246
(9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error and substantial prejudice for a petitioner to prevail
on a due process claim).
Gonzalez Flores failed to challenge in her opening brief the BIA’s
determination that her removal from the United States does not violate the rights of
her United States citizen children, and this claim is therefore waived. See Rizk v.
Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1091 n.3 (9th Cir. 2011).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED
12-73231 2

-- 2 of 2 --