Margalit Corber v. D.C. No. 2:12-cv-09986-PSG-EMEMORANDUM FILED SEP 24 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S.…

13-56306Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit24 set 2013

Testo completo

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARGALIT CORBER; RENE CARO;
STEVE DANTZLER; LINDA
SOWARDS; LORI HUISMAN; JOHNNY
GEORGE, Sr.; TERRY PERRY;
WILLIAM RACKLEY; ANGELA
YOUNG; PAMELA RODRIGUEZ;
STEVEN SYVERSON; OLGA
CAICOYA; JANET CARROLL; ROSE
CASH; ULAD CELENTANO; VIRGINIA
COSTANZO; KIMBERLY FILLIGIM;
ARMELDIA SMITH; CARLA WEST;
JOANNE BIERZYNSKI, individually and
as next of kin to Eleanor Wojcik;
SHARLEY MORRIS; WYOMIA
TIMMONS; DEAN REINKING; DANIEL
THORNE; WENDELEN ASHBY;
CARMEN BEDFORD; CLAUDE
COMMODORE; JAMES HENSON;
NANCY LOCKE; MILDRED SCOTT;
BILLIE BURNETT; SHEENA HALL;
BRENDA ROBERGE, individually and as
next of kin to Ernest Roberge; DEBORAH
WOODSUM; RICHARD PASCUITO,
Plaintiffs - Appellees,
v.
No. 13-56306
D.C. No. 2:12-cv-09986-PSG-E
MEMORANDUM*
FILED
SEP 24 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

-- 1 of 3 --

XANODYNE PHARMACEUTICALS,
INC.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted August 30, 2013
Pasadena, California
Before: GOULD and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and LEMELLE, District
Judge.**
We conclude that Plaintiff’s petition for coordination was not a proposal to
try the cases jointly. See Judith Romo, et al. v. Teva Pharmaceutical USA, Inc.,
No. 13-80036 (9th Cir., Sept. 24, 2013). We AFFIRM the district court’s order
granting Plaintiffs’ motion to remand.
** The Honorable Ivan L.R. Lemelle, District Judge for the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, sitting by designation.
13-56306 2

-- 2 of 3 --

Corber v. Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals, No. 13-56306
Gould, Circuit Judge, dissenting:
I respectfully dissent for the same reasons expressed in the dissent to the
majority opinion in Romo v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, No. 13-56310.
FILED
SEP 24 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
1

-- 3 of 3 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.