Testo completo
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DILMAN MOLINA SALGUERO,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 12-70302
Agency No. A070-640-004
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted August 14, 2013**
Before: SCHROEDER, GRABER, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Dilman Molina Salguero, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se
for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing as
untimely his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have
jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition for review.
FILED
AUG 19 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS
-- 1 of 2 --
12-70302 2
The BIA properly dismissed Salguero’s appeal as untimely because the
record reflects that the BIA received Salguero’s Notice of Appeal 45 days after the
appeal deadline and Salguero has not provided any explanation for the late filing.
See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.38(b)-(c).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
-- 2 of 2 --
