United States of America v. William Molina-Ochoa

12-10416Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit21 giu 2013

Testo completo

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The Honorable Timothy M. Burgess, United States District Judge for**
the District of Alaska, sitting by designation.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision***
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
WILLIAM MOLINA-OCHOA,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 12-10416
D.C. No. 4:12-cr-50044-DCB
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Timothy M. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding**
Submitted June 18, 2013***
Before: TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
William Molina-Ochoa appeals from the judgment revoking supervised
release and the 21-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v.
FILED
JUN 21 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

12-10416 2
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Molina-Ochoa’s counsel has filed a brief stating
that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of
record. We have provided Molina-Ochoa the opportunity to file a pro se
supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been
filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.