Adriene J. Sessa, pro se v. Wild Horse Pass Hotel & Casino, a Gila River Group Enterprise

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28
**
U.S.C. § 636(c).
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision***
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ADRIENE J. SESSA, pro se,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WILD HORSE PASS HOTEL &
CASINO, a Gila River Group Enterprise,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 12-17636
D.C. No. 2:12-cv-00796-MHB
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Michelle H. Burns, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**
Submitted June 10, 2013***
Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
Adriene J. Sessa appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
her employment discrimination action for failure to prosecute. We have
FILED
JUN 17 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

12-17636 2
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We may affirm on any ground supported by
the record. Van Asdale v. Int’l Game Tech., 577 F.3d 989, 994 (9th Cir. 2009).
We affirm.
Dismissal of Sessa’s action was proper because it was barred by tribal
sovereign immunity. See Allen v. Gold Country Casino, 464 F.3d 1044, 1047 (9th
Cir. 2006) (holding that tribal sovereign immunity bars an action brought against a
tribal owned and operated casino).
Sessa’s request to strike defendant’s letter to this court, filed on April 15,
2013, and motion for appointment of counsel, filed on May 16, 2013, are denied.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --