United States of America v. Jaime Cisneros

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAIME CISNEROS,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 12-50060
D.C. No. 2:95-cr-00595-SVW
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 19, 2012**
Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Jaime Cisneros appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the
revocation of his supervised release and the 24-month sentence imposed upon
revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Cisneros’s
FILED
JAN 02 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

12-50060 2
counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a
motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Cisneros the
opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or
answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Cisneros’s motion to expedite is DENIED AS MOOT.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --