United States of America v. Lucas Gerardo Sanchez- Sandoval

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The Honorable James P. Jones, United States District Judge for the*
*
Western District of Virginia, sitting by designation.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision***
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LUCAS GERARDO SANCHEZ-
SANDOVAL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Nos. 11-10385
11-10610
D.C. Nos. 4:11-cr-50017-CKJ
4:11-cr-50016-CKJ
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
James P. Jones, District Judge, Presiding**
Submitted November 13, 2012***
Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated appeals, Lucas Gerardo Sanchez-Sandoval appeals
FILED
NOV 19 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

11-10385 & 11-10610 2
from the revocation of his supervised release and the consecutive 21-month
sentences imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), Sanchez-Sandoval’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no
grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have
provided Sanchez-Sandoval the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No
pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. We
dismiss in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d
974, 988 (9th Cir. 2009).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --