Avraham More-Yossef v. ERIC H. HOLDER JR., Attorney General

09-71690Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit18 ott 2012

Testo completo

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
The Honorable Gordon J. Quist, Senior United States District Judge***
for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
AVRAHAM MORE-YOSSEF,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 09-71690
Agency No. A072-301-429
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Department of Homeland Security
Submitted October 11, 2012**
Pasadena, California
Before: KLEINFELD and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges, and QUIST, Senior
District Judge.***
Avraham More-Yossef, a native and citizen of Israel, petitions for review of an
order of the Department of Homeland Security reinstating a June 10, 2007, order of
FILED
OCT 18 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2
removal against More-Yossef. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 to review
reinstatements of prior orders of removal, see Morales-Izquierdo v. Gonzales, 486
F.3d 484, 495-98 (9th Cir. 2007) (en banc), and we dismiss in part and deny in part
the petition for review.
The reinstatement order complies with immigration regulations. See 8 C.F.R.
§ 241.8.
We lack jurisdiction to consider More-Yossef’s collateral challenge to his prior
expedited removal order. See Garcia de Rincon v. Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 539 F.3d
1133, 1136, 1138-39 (9th Cir. 2008).
PETITION DISMISSED in part and DENIED in part.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continua la tua ricerca in ChatGPT o Claude

Collega Omnilex per cercare nel corpus legale dal tuo assistente IA.