Testo completo
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
OSCAR PADILLA,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-75145
Agency No. A073-868-045
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted October 9, 2012**
Before: RAWLINSON, MURGUIA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Oscar Padilla, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the
Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252.
FILED
OCT 15 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS
-- 1 of 2 --
08-75145 2
We review de novo questions of law, Gil v. Holder, 651 F.3d 1000, 1002 (9th Cir.
2011), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not err in determining that Padilla may not impute his father’s
lawful permanent residence for purposes of meeting the requirements of 8 U.S.C.
§ 1229b(a)(2). See Sawyers v. Holder, 684 F.3d 911 (9th Cir. 2012) (per curiam).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
-- 2 of 2 --
