Testo completo
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARIA DEL SOCORRO MEDINA DE
CARDENAS,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 11-70605
Agency No. A079-525-489
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 10, 2012**
Before: WARDLAW, CLIFTON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Maria Del Socorro Medina De Cardenas, a native and citizen of Mexico,
petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying
her motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.
FILED
SEP 17 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS
-- 1 of 2 --
11-70605 2
§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Garcia
v. Holder, 621 F.3d 906, 912 (9th Cir. 2010), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Medina De Cardenas’
motion to reopen on the ground that the new evidence of hardship she submitted
was not likely to change the outcome of her case. See Shin v. Mukasey, 547 F.3d
1019, 1025 (9th Cir. 2008).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
-- 2 of 2 --
