Angrej Singh v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANGREJ SINGH,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 10-73659
Agency No. A071-854-089
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted August 8, 2012**
Before: ALARCÓN, BERZON, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Angrej Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board
of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration
judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his motion to reopen exclusion proceedings. We
dismiss the petition for review as moot.
FILED
AUG 15 2012
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

Singh’s petition for review of the later order was dismissed as1
untimely. See Singh v. Holder, No. 11-71269 (9th Cir. Mar. 12, 2012).
10-73659 2
The BIA dismissed Singh’s appeal from the IJ’s order denying his June 23,
2009, motion to reopen on the ground that the motion should have been filed with
the BIA in the first instance. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a). We dismiss as moot
Singh’s petition challenging the procedural dismissal because, in a subsequent
order, the BIA addressed the merits of the same claims.1
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --